BD Insights

How AI is Changing Brand Messaging — And How Brands Must Adapt

29 NOVEMBER 2025

Artificial Intelligence is no longer a peripheral tool in marketing; it is now embedded in the very fabric of how brands communicate. Generative AI creates copy, images, and video at scale. Predictive algorithms personalize recommendations and automate customer service. Machine learning systems decide which messages reach which audiences, and when. This shift is profound because audiences do not interpret AI outputs as neutral technology. They read them as reflections of the brand itself. A chatbot that mishandles a complaint, a recommendation that feels manipulative, or an algorithm that excludes certain groups is not judged as a technical glitch but as evidence of the brand’s values. In this way, AI collapses the boundary between technology and identity, making every AI‑driven message a test of credibility.

Messaging Under AI Scrutiny

The rise of AI introduces new trust dynamics. Consumers expect fairness, clarity, and respect in every interaction. When an AI system generates content that feels biased or opaque, the brand is judged as evasive or untrustworthy. Privacy concerns amplify this effect. If people believe their data is being used without consent, they interpret it as betrayal. Messaging must therefore anticipate these reactions, embedding explanations, safeguards, and human oversight into communication. In the AI era, transparency is not optional; it is the baseline expectation.

Real-World Shifts in Messaging

Consider Heinz’s “AI Ketchup” campaign, which used generative AI to create surreal images of ketchup bottles in different artistic styles. The campaign achieved hundreds of millions of impressions globally and refreshed the brand’s image among younger audiences. The lesson here is that AI can expand creative storytelling, but it must be anchored in brand identity to avoid gimmickry. Netflix offers another example. Its recommendation engine is a form of AI messaging: every suggestion communicates what the brand “thinks” you will enjoy. When personalization works, it strengthens trust and engagement. When it fails, recommending irrelevant or insensitive content, it risks alienating viewers. Spotify’s AI‑driven playlists similarly show how machine learning can reinforce inclusivity and cultural fluency, but they also highlight the risk of narrowing tastes if algorithms over‑personalize.

These examples illustrate that AI is not just a delivery mechanism. It is a narrative force. Each AI‑driven interaction communicates something about the brand’s values, whether intentional or not.

How Brand Messages Must Adapt

To remain credible, brand messages must evolve in several ways. Transparency must become the baseline. Brands need to disclose when AI is involved, explain why it is used, and clarify its limits in plain language. Empathy must replace efficiency as the guiding principle of automated communication. A chatbot that acknowledges frustration during a flight delay builds trust, while one that offers only transactional responses erodes it. Proof must accompany every claim. Promises about personalization, speed, or accuracy must be pressure‑tested against reality and backed by evidence. Finally, safeguards against bias must be embedded into messaging systems. Recruitment platforms, for instance, have faced backlash when algorithms disproportionately screened out women or minorities. Messaging in these contexts must acknowledge fairness audits and demonstrate accountability.

Practical Steps for Brands

Brands can take several concrete steps to adapt their messaging for the AI era. First, they should conduct AI messaging audits to identify where automated systems are already shaping communication — from customer service bots to recommendation engines. These audits should evaluate not only accuracy but also tone, inclusivity, and transparency. Second, brands should develop AI disclosure protocols, deciding when and how to inform consumers that a message was generated or delivered by AI. Third, they should invest in training teams to write for AI contexts, ensuring that prompts, scripts, and oversight mechanisms embed empathy and clarity. Fourth, they should establish bias testing frameworks, regularly evaluating AI outputs across demographic groups to prevent exclusion or stereotyping. Finally, they should integrate trust metrics into their measurement systems, tracking not only engagement but also sentiment, credibility, and resilience.

The Future of Messaging in an AI World

AI accelerates communication, but it also accelerates scrutiny. Messages are now judged not only by what they say but by how they are generated and whether they withstand interrogation. Trust becomes the ultimate currency. Brands that adapt will embed fairness, transparency, and accountability into every AI‑driven message. They will treat messaging as a system of credibility, not a marketing accessory. Those that ignore this shift risk reputational contagion: once consumers perceive AI outputs as manipulative or biased, skepticism spreads quickly across platforms.

The most resilient organizations will narrate their AI journey openly, admitting complexity, showing their work, and inviting scrutiny. In doing so, they will transform AI from a source of suspicion into a platform for credibility. AI does not simply change how messages are delivered; it changes what messages mean. Every AI‑generated output is a reflection of brand values. The brands that thrive will be those that design messaging systems to withstand scrutiny, anticipate resistance, and build trust before campaigns even launch.

References

Davenport, T. H., & Mittal, N. (2022). The future of customer engagement: AI and personalization in marketing. Journal of Business Strategy, 43(5), 25–33.

Gursoy, D., Chi, C. G., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157–169.

Lankton, N. K., McKnight, D. H., & Tripp, J. (2015). Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(10), 880–918.

Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Resistance to medical Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629–650.

Paschen, J., Pitt, C., & Kietzmann, J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and its impact on marketing. Journal of Business Research, 118, 292–300.

Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298–322.

Tussyadiah, I. P., & Park, S. (2018). Consumer evaluation of AI service robots in hospitality. Tourism Management, 66, 123–133.